All zones are anchored to 5K race pace — a single, measurable reference point that scales correctly across all abilities. The model is based on Seiler's polarised training research.
Z1 HR ceiling = MAF. Z2–Z5 prescribed by pace; use HR as a check only.
Norwegian exercise scientist Stephen Seiler studied elite endurance athletes across multiple sports and found a consistent pattern: the best performers spent approximately 80% of training time at low intensity and 20% at high intensity — with very little in the middle.
This "polarised" model outperforms threshold-heavy training in research trials, producing greater improvements in VO₂max, lactate threshold, and race performance — particularly for masters athletes where recovery capacity is lower.
Key insight: most recreational runners train too hard on easy days and not hard enough on hard days. The zones in this calculator are designed to enforce that separation.
80% of weekly training volume should be easy (Z1–Z2). 20% hard (Z3–Z5). This distribution is based on Seiler's analysis of elite training logs and has been validated in intervention studies with recreational runners.
For masters runners, erring toward 85/15 is prudent — recovery capacity declines with age.
Easy running is where the foundational adaptations happen. Training at Z1–Z2 stimulates mitochondrial density — increasing the number and efficiency of the cells' energy-producing units. More mitochondria means more aerobic capacity at every intensity.
Z1–Z2 also develops a denser capillary network around muscle fibres, improving oxygen delivery and waste removal. These adaptations are slow-build — they accumulate over months, not weeks — and they cannot be rushed by training harder.
For masters runners specifically: aerobic base work carries the lowest injury and recovery cost. The athletes who improve most consistently are almost always the ones who protect their easy days.
Predicted times use the Riegel formula: T₂ = T₁ × (D₂/D₁)1.06. The 1.06 exponent accounts for endurance decay across distances.
Marathon will overshoot for athletes without a long-run base. Treat predictions as ranges, not promises.
MAF = 180 − age (Maffetone). For masters runners, MAF defines the Z1 HR ceiling — overriding the standard %HRmax bound used by Z2–Z5.
Rationale: at age 40+, the 75% HRmax ceiling often pushes athletes above true aerobic threshold. MAF is more conservative and protects easy days. For athletes 55+, cross-check with talk test and nose-breathing.
If MAF feels too restrictive — use the 30-minute field test below to find the athlete's actual aerobic threshold HR instead of relying on the formula.
Pace is the primary prescription. HR lags pace by 60–90s at Z4/Z5, drifts in heat, and is suppressed by fatigue. Use HR to govern easy runs; use pace to govern intervals.
The Tanaka formula (208 − 0.7 × age) has a ±10–12 bpm error. For accurate HR zone prescription, field test it and enter the result in Tested HRmax.
The safest field method for finding true HRmax:
Use when the MAF formula feels too restrictive:
Evidence base: East Carolina University (2005) found the 30-minute time trial was the only field test whose estimated lactate threshold HR did not significantly differ from blood-draw lab results — outperforming the Conconi test and formula-based methods.